25 Apr 08:13
Re: Privacy
On Monday 25 April 2005 04:58, Trejkaz wrote: > But what I don't get right now is, because of the single list limitation, > merging invisibility with "normal" privacy rules, more or less requires > constructing a new list for every combination of the two.I think this can achieved by: 1. saving the rules with their correct names on the server 2. having a ruleset named "(temp: invisibility)" - current session invisibility - might be dropped if the current session invisibility rules are storred in Psi only 3. using ruleset "(temp: timestamp)" as the current set , transparently merging the active ruleset with "(temp: invisibility)" 4. remove "(temp: *)" on account log-on/log-off (on log-off is not very secure, since you don't know how (any) Jabber client is stopped. Mircea P.S. hmmm.. maybe the JEP should be extended to support temporary lists. Oh, this is in XMPP... :/ -- -- Psi Forums Moderator/Bug Tracker Manager Psi Windows Installer Maintainer/ArchLinux Package Maintainerer http://mircea.bardac.net
I think this can achieved by:
1. saving the rules with their correct names on the server
2. having a ruleset named "(temp: invisibility)" - current session
invisibility - might be dropped if the current session invisibility rules are
storred in Psi only
3. using ruleset "(temp: timestamp)" as the current set , transparently
merging the active ruleset with "(temp: invisibility)"
4. remove "(temp: *)" on account log-on/log-off (on log-off is not very
secure, since you don't know how (any) Jabber client is stopped.
Mircea
P.S. hmmm.. maybe the JEP should be extended to support temporary lists. Oh,
this is in XMPP... :/
RSS Feed