Re: "Roles", was PROJECT: Bug Tracking

I agree completely; I figured it would be useful to have zero monitoring 
things as well (and no one else had volunteered to be auditor, so I 
figured I could at least start with that).

At the very least, the admins should all have access; it'd probably be 
best to let any member access any stats or charts that wouldn't contain 
any private info on a server or a member and restrict those to the folks 
who are on any of the operational teams.

I'll add "alerts <at> " to the list of lists I need to get set up with mailman.

-robin

Julian De Marchi wrote:
> . ..
> The nagios monitoring host should not be a critical system in the 
> OpenNIC network. The host should be on a machine whos sole purpose is 
> to monitor the state of the OpenNIC network. I have nearly finished my 
> nagios setup on a host.
>
> I am unsure who should have access to the charts and graphs and other 
> information nagios contains. Who should have access?
>
> Also the alerts nagios outputs, should go to a list like 
> alerts <at> opennic.unrated.net? I have also been testing nagios to produce 
> a voice alert if the internet connection of the host goes down.
>
> Julian
...
######################################################################
This is the discussion list for the Open Network Information
Center.  You can unsubscribe by sending an email containing the words
"unsubscribe discuss" in the body of the message to
"majordomo <at> opennic.glue" or "majordomo <at> opennic.unrated.net".
######################################################################