Re: Problems going through NAT configured with ferm

On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 06:22:34PM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote:
> Yup.  Any idea of why the two implementations are treated differently?

Not really. The packets are smaller.

> The size of the initial package triggering a "should be fragmented"
> thingy erronously?
> 
> > But just to be sure: Please send the output of ifconfig and if you wanto
> > to anonymize things please replace the inside ip address by something
> > like <inside-ip> and the outside address accordingly.

> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:F8:D9:3B:F1  
>           inet addr:<outside-ip>  Bcast:255.255.255.255  Mask:255.255.192.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:576  Metric:1

An MTU size of 576. Why that small? Unless under very rare circumstances
there is no reason for such a small MTU size.

 Ciao
   Joerg
--

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer@...>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.