Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: adam hyde <adam-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/wNWPw <at> public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: cc-by-sa and gpl
Newsgroups: gmane.org.creativecommons.licenses
Date: Monday 2nd July 2007 16:11:01 UTC (over 9 years ago)
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 16:43 +0100, Andres Guadamuz wrote:
> Dear Adam,
> 
> As far as I know, there is an official list of compatible licences, which
is
> empty at the moment. See:
> 
> http://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses
> 

thanks - thats an interesting resource. It states:

"Creative Commons approves licenses as compatible when they, at a
minimum, contain terms that have the same purpose, meaning and effect as
the key license elements of a particular Creative Commons license and
when a license explicitly permits the relicensing of derivatives of
works made available under that license under a particular Creative
Commons license."


It would seem the GPL would not be 'compatible' under these terms as the
GPL does not explicitly permit: "the relicensing of derivatives of works
made available under that license under a particular Creative Commons
license"

The gpl does not do this. However, how does the CC-GPL fit into this
picture? :
http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl


Its the GPL with a CC wrapper...is the CC-GPL considered to be living
within the CC family of licenses? If so, then the CC-GPL is 'compatible'
and the question is answered.

is there anyone that can clarify this? 

Just to retour...My specific question is:

Can content under the CC-BY-SA (3.0) be distributed under the GPL? ie.
Is the GPL or 'CC-GPL' a 'similar' or 'compatible' license as per the
license statement :
"you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a
compatible license."

anyone want to make me a happy camper with a categorical yes or no? ;)

The reason _why_ this is an interesting question for me is that
documentation about free software is often written in CC BY-SA. If this
material can be then distributed under the GPL then the docs could be
distributed with source code without causing developers extra license
headaches.


adam


> Best Regards,
> 
> Andres
> 
> -----------------
> Andres Guadamuz
> AHRC Research Centre for Studies in
> Intellectual Property and Technology Law
> Old College, South Bridge
> Edinburgh EH8 9YL 
> 
> Tel: 44 (0)131 6509699
> Fax: 44 (0)131 6506317
> [email protected]
> http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/
> 
> IP/IT/Medical Law LLM by Distance Learning
> http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/distancelearning/
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[email protected].org
>
[mailto:[email protected].org]
On Behalf Of adam hyde
> Sent: 02 July 2007 15:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [cc-licenses] cc-by-sa and gpl
> 
> hi,
> 
> I was wondering...Can material that is licensed under the CC-BY-SA (3.0)
> license be re-issued under the GPL.
> 
> I know the two licenses are not compatible. However the clause states:
> "you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a
> compatible license."
> 
> What exactly does 'similar' mean? Is the GPL sufficently 'similar' to the
> CC-BY-SA?
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
> --
> adam hyde
> 'free as in media'
> 
> ~/.nl
> 
> http://www.flossmanuals.net
> http://www.simpel.cc
> http://www.radioqualia.net
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
> 
> 
> 
-- 
adam hyde
'free as in media'

~/.nl

http://www.flossmanuals.net
http://www.simpel.cc
http://www.radioqualia.net
 
CD: 15ms