11 May 13:44
Re: Orphan Works Act of 2008
From: Crosbie Fitch <crosbie <at> cyberspaceengineers.org>
Subject: Re: Orphan Works Act of 2008
Newsgroups: gmane.org.freeculture.discuss
Date: 2008-05-11 11:47:06 GMT
Subject: Re: Orphan Works Act of 2008
Newsgroups: gmane.org.freeculture.discuss
Date: 2008-05-11 11:47:06 GMT
This act is necessary for the publishing cartel because as they start changing copyright infringement into a crime, they can no longer rely upon self-publishers having no hope of prosecuting infringement when they wilfully appropriate their works - they're now faced with such appropriation being prosecuted by the state. This orphan works act thus restores the carte blanche they've always been used to to appropriate copyrighted works from the little guy. Hopefully, we can take it as another reminder that copyright is a weapon to be wielded by large and commercial publishers, not mere citizens (even if they do end up on its pointy end). So, if you thought the NC on CC-NC had any positive effect at all (it has plenty of negative, self-harming and community-harming effects), you should now realise it's completely impotent against commercial publishers. What the traditional/corporate publishers don't realise is that by preserving their ability to appropriate 'supposedly copyrighted' work from the little guys (defunct non-cartel members and self-publishers), whilst remaining able to prosecute infringements of their own works, they are simply helping self-publishers wean themselves away from any delusions that the copyright based business model remains viable. For self-publishers, it is copyleft or don't publish. Any pretense at constraint simply hurts promotion of the art and the artists' reputation - as well as impacting any revenue. So, copyleft licenses (with no naïve clauses such as 'mandatory attribution', 'non-commercial', or 'no derivatives') will help self-publishers come to terms with the post-copyright reality. The more people understand that copyright is for traditional publishers and not for citizens, the more self-publishers will start using business models that not only don't depend on copyright, but positively thrive upon its ineffectiveness or absence. Traditional publishers are unwittingly cultivating the best environment for their primary competitors to thrive and overtake them - the public.
RSS Feed