11 May 16:59
Re: Orphan Works Act of 2008
Fred Benenson <fred.benenson <at> gmail.com>
2008-05-11 14:59:32 GMT
2008-05-11 14:59:32 GMT
Right, I realized that at the same time as I hit send.
Oh well, an interesting way to introduce the idea but obviously not sufficient or necessary!
F
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Gavin Baker <gavin <at> gavinbaker.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Fred Benenson wrote:
Hash: SHA1
[...]| One way to think of it, and I haven't given this as much thought as IWell, except the other 4 factors are actually defenses to infringement.
| should, would be that it essentially adding a 5-factor to fair use,
| which I think is probably a good thing.
This bill doesn't get the infringing user off the hook entirely, but
limits the monetary and injunctive relief available. So I can see the
way it's analogous to fair use, but it's not quite the same thing.
in the dream
my dog has a whistle
only I can hear
~ John Stevenson-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----iD8DBQFIJwlttLXQdLhFpekRArbdAJ93Lowvpzjeqg4N1a7PzU4g5K/DcQCdFlzl
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
DN+B1gLF+AJnJdEPaJBY7bA=
=sEpF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss <at> freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss <at> freeculture.org http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RSS Feed