30 Jun 07:21
Re: Better voting
From: CLAY S <clay <at> brokenladder.com>
Subject: Re: Better voting
Newsgroups: gmane.org.freeculture.discuss
Date: 2008-06-30 05:21:01 GMT
Subject: Re: Better voting
Newsgroups: gmane.org.freeculture.discuss
Date: 2008-06-30 05:21:01 GMT
cool. thanks.
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:55, Asheesh Laroia <freeculture <at> asheesh.org> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, CLAY S wrote:This is an interesting suggestion. I'd love to hear what people have to
> Hello,
>
> My name is Clay Shentrup, and I evangelize "score voting", also known as
> "range voting", where the candidates are simply scored like books on
> Amazon. The candidate with the most points, or "best average score",
> wins.
>
> This system is much simpler than your current Condorcet method, Schulze, and
> significantly better per an objective economic measure called Bayesian
> regret (calculated through extensive computer simulation). This is
> especially true in light of strategic voting, which is a counter-intuitive
> result to some.
say, especially Mako, who suggested our current setup.
-- Asheesh.
--
Concept, n.:
Any "idea" for which an outside consultant billed you more than
$25,000.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss <at> freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
clay shentrup
phone: 206.801.0484
"Iraq? No, YOU rock!"
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss <at> freeculture.org http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
RSS Feed