Fred Benenson | 3 Aug 23:47

Re: End of the Patry Copyright Blog

Note also that in the comments Crosbie Fitch admits to being one of the 'crazies' that Patry partially credits for helping him make this decision. 

F

On Aug 3, 2008, at 3:28 PM, "Elizabeth Stark" <emstark <at> gmail.com> wrote:

One can close comments to avoid trolls. I don't agree with his decision, and I don't think we'll necessarily always be able to rely on archive.org to back the internet up. We call this the "mem ory hole" in JZ's Cyberlaw course.

On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Denver Gingerich <denver <at> ossguy.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Elizabeth Stark <emstark <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Despite its (semi-)availability on the wayback machine, I'm a bit shocked
> that he deleted his archives! It's one thing to stop blogging, but another
> to delete your entire history of doing so. In the field of law and
> technology scholarship we often rely on sources like these (i.e. we dealt
> with a lot of citations to blog posts on the Journal of Law and Technology),
> and the potential for them to disappear like that is rather haunting...

He is considering re-posting the archives, according to a comment he
left on his last post.  He also explains his rationale for removing
the archives:

William Patry said...

"[...] I will think about the archive point; I deleted prior posts
because leaving them up meant subjecting myself to the same
misunderstandings that led me to close the blog. And even for this
last post, one attracts trolls. [...]"

Denver
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss <at> freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss <at> freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss <at> freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Gmane