www.freebsd.org

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 16:35, Phil Pennock <ipv6-ops+phil <at> spodhuis.org> wrote:
> On 2010-10-03 at 13:55 -0700, Doug Barton forwarded:
>> FYI. Some non-IPv6-related bits have been snipped.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch <at> FreeBSD.org>
>> Subject: IPv6 usage of www.freebsd.org
>> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:31:18 +0200
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked the current IPv6 usage of our homepage www.freebsd.org
>>
>> In the last 30 days we had 5.32 million page views. Many are from web
>> crawlers (bots) and other automated scripts (nagios, curl, libfetch).
>> Apparently, 2.73 millions page views (51.5%) are from humans (or your
>> cat 
>>
>> 1.35% of the page view are IPv6. For the bots it is much higher: 4.8%
>
> These numbers don't appear to add up.  I must be misinterpreting them.
> I'll show my interpretation, then can you perhaps enlighten me with the
> clue-by-four?
>
> 1.35% of all page views are IPv6.

the 1.35% (out of  2.73 millions page views) are from non-bots

sorry for the confusing statement,
Wolfram

> 5.32 million page views total.
> IPv6 page view count: 71820
>
> 4.8% of all bot page views are IPv6
> 2.73 million page views from humans, subtract from 5.32m to get: 2.59m
> IPv6 page views from bots = 4.8% of 2.59 million = 124320
>
> So there were 71820 IPv6 page views total, of which 124320 were from
> bots.  Which is a confusing statement.
>
> What calculations *should* I have done, please?
>
> Thanks,
> -Phil, who pushed a cat's butt off his keyboard this morning.
>

--

-- 
Wolfram Schneider <wosch <at> FreeBSD.org> http://wolfram.schneider.org