7 Aug 19:57
Re: Election results
Andrew Sullivan <ajs <at> crankycanuck.ca>
2007-08-07 17:57:50 GMT
2007-08-07 17:57:50 GMT
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:51:24PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Anyway, should/how could we try to fix this proportionality failure? I don't believe Condorcet of any stripe is intended to fix the proportionality you seem to be interested in. My dim recollection of Condorcet, from the days when I studied voting systems > 10 years ago, was that it was intended to solve the problem where some (largish) percentage of voters have _none_ of their preferences reflected. The idea here is that voters are more willing to accept their second-best (or third- or whatever-best) choice in preference to the thing they regard as worst. This tends to mean that polarising choices are always excluded, and that exclusion is regarded as a feature and not a bug. A -- -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs <at> crankycanuck.ca Everything that happens in the world happens at some place. --Jane Jacobs
RSS Feed