28 Jun 00:32
Re: Server Grade Hardware Purchase [OT]
From: Dennis Little <cplug@...>
Subject: Re: Server Grade Hardware Purchase [OT]
Newsgroups: gmane.org.user-groups.linux.cplug.general
Date: 2008-06-27 22:32:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Server Grade Hardware Purchase [OT]
Newsgroups: gmane.org.user-groups.linux.cplug.general
Date: 2008-06-27 22:32:44 GMT
On Fri, June 27, 2008 12:04 pm, Josiah Ritchie wrote: > I haven't purchased server grade hardware in over a year. In my prior > shop, we would almost always default to Dell. I've heard whispers that > HP is the way to go. I want a machine that I know runs lots of other Hey Josiah, Here are a few of my opinions. Take them for what they are worth. -HP makes nice hardware, but I will second Bob's opinion of finding upgrade / add-on parts and forget finding support documentation, drivers, etc. once the hardware gets any age on it. As a matter of fact, finding anything on HP's web site is a total bear. They could learn a few things from support.dell.com. :) HP is fairly notorious for rigging their equipment to make a piece of otherwise standard hardware proprietary. Case in point: old LaserJet RAM was simple PC133 RAM with several pins jumpered to one another. If the printer did not detect the jumpered pins, it would not recognize the RAM. I did a how-to a few years back about turning regular RAM into HP printer RAM. I am in the process of putting two HP 7000 series blade chassis into production. Thus far, I am impressed, but as I expected, finding documentation on them is still a little bit hard, even though they are current. I am not sure how much we will regret buying these when we need support in a few years. -Dell has given me no problems whatsoever with various flavors of Linux (SuSE, Ubuntu, RHEL, BSD) and I like the fact that Dell has less proprietary hardware than HP. I give Dell tremendous bonus points for support.dell.com. No other OEM gives you the power to go to a site, type in a model or service tag and get drivers within 1 minute with virtually no searching. I had a laptop I was working on the other day that shipped in 1999 and I could still get the drivers, manuals, etc. just as easily as something new. In my opinion, if I cannot get support for hardware a few years from now, I would rather not even use it. Dell also has a ton of involvement with open-source O/S drivers and management, making their solutions somewhat easier to use. -SuperMicro always seems attractive to me in some way, but has always fallen short for one reason or another. I maintain several 4x4 SATA chassis systems and they all have issues. On the first generation, I do not think that we have a single drive tray that is not broken, after only 2 years of use. The trays jam and then the release mechanism breaks. They are of very poor design and fit. The trays have been used maybe 10 times each. On the new chassis, it is near impossible to remove more than one column of drives at a time because of the low clearance between columns of drives. If you have a drive in an adjacent column just popped out of the chassis, the drives in the next column over cannot be removed or inserted. On top of that, the trays are so difficult to remove the first 10 times or so that you risk whipping the tray across the room when it finally lets loose; one must put almost all of their body weight on the tray to get it out. -Penguin Computing has been about the same as Super Micro on the one model I worked with. I think the worst thing about that particular case was that the rack rails would separate when the server was only about 1/2 out of the rack. That made things exciting! Additionally, Penguin had zero support materials readily available online the last that I checked. This is out of the scope of your question, but let me gripe about EMC for a second too. Why in the heck can I not download manuals, specs, anything unless I own an EMC product and have a privileged account to Powerlink? Insane. Best Regards, Dennis Little -- Building a quality internship program: http://centralpennbusiness.com/blog.asp?pid=1302
RSS Feed