11 Oct 16:24
Re: Is the proprietary camp winning ?
Chakkaradeep C C wrote: > Shocking News !! > > http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/10/10/BAGERLM3RR15.DTL A very sad story indeed. The report says: <quote> Hans Reiser was accused earlier this year of failing to pay medical and child-care expenses... </quote> No father - much less a free software developer - would have the heart to bear that. Macaulay had spoken strongly in favour of copyrights (read as "proprietary software" for the purposes of this thread) and the entire speech is available at : http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/25/1345/03329 The speech was made in the House of Commons, when an attempt was made to increase the term of copyrights from 20 years from date of publication of the work to that much time after the life time of the author. The bill was defeated then, but the law at present is on the lines of the then defeated bill. Some of the key points made by Macaulay in his speech are: * Copyright is a form of tax - albeit very evil* but a *necessity*. * Without copyrights, authors would have to depend on the government or others for support - which would only give room for more evil. Macaulay based his arguments upon careful reasoning and forcible examples - nothing much has changed today. It may be fair and just to have a clause in the license that *if* the software is redistributed under any arrangement for money, 10% thereof should be paid as royalty to the author(s). ISPs and others could be asked to pay the authors and content providers - it may be just a few units of money or a fraction thereof per download or distribution, but given the volume, it should yield enough for projects worth it to survive, keep going and flourish. The proprietary camp should never be seen to be winning and smiling. -Ramanraj K _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email ilugc-request@... with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
RSS Feed