Re: Comments and questions on XBL2 Working Draft

On 09/08/06, Mikko Pohja <mikko.pohja <at> hut.fi> wrote:
> FYI, WAF WG has decided to create an XBL Primer to explain the purpose
> of the language.

Should this not be published before the specification is worked on, if
the purpose isn't clear, how can you create a specification - or if
it's clear within the working group as I assume is more likely, how
can you publish documents for public review without the public also
understanding the purpose of what is being published?

Cheers,

Jim.