Re: unsubscribe

Was that done because of the Microsoft patent?

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:02 AM, David Aiello, sympatico
<daiello@...> wrote:
>
> Pls & thx
>
> David
>
>
> If you can look into the seeds of time, and say which grain will grow and
> which will not, speak to me.  - Shakespeare
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2-Sep-08, at 4:50 AM, Mechiel Lukkien <mechiel@...> wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> last week, i was wondering why page up/down was not working (on the
>> openbsd port).  it seems the code to handle page up/down events is
>> commented out, in emu/port/win-x11a.c.  the patch below enables it, and
>> works for me.  i don't know why that code was commented out.  there was
>> nothing in inferno-os svn about it.  i don't know the difference between
>> XK_Page_Down & XK_KP_Page_Down, i'm assuming handling both is correct
>> (the other switch-cases are similar).  a similar change might be useful
>> to enable Home & Insert key processing?
>>
>> does anyone see problems with this? or know why the keys were disabled?
>>
>> best regards,
>> mechiel
>>
>>
>> the patch:
>>
>> Index: win-x11a.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- win-x11a.c    (revision 299)
>> +++ win-x11a.c    (working copy)
>> @@ -1084,18 +1084,18 @@
>>       case XK_KP_Right:
>>           k = Right;
>>           break;
>> -//        case XK_Page_Down:
>> -//        case XK_KP_Page_Down:
>> -//            k = Kpgdown;
>> -//            break;
>> +        case XK_Page_Down:
>> +        case XK_KP_Page_Down:
>> +            k = Pgdown;
>> +            break;
>>       case XK_End:
>>       case XK_KP_End:
>>           k = End;
>>           break;
>> -//        case XK_Page_Up:
>> -//        case XK_KP_Page_Up:
>> -//            k = Kpgup;
>> -//            break;
>> +        case XK_Page_Up:
>> +        case XK_KP_Page_Up:
>> +            k = Pgup;
>> +            break;
>> //        case XK_Insert:
>> //        case XK_KP_Insert:
>> //            k = Kins;
>