2 Feb 2006 11:32
Re: PostgreSQL
Curt Sampson <cjs <at> cynic.net>
2006-02-02 10:32:16 GMT
2006-02-02 10:32:16 GMT
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Marcin Jessa wrote: > What CPU's are you referring to and how many of them when you say > performance is pretty much the same? > Would that include SMP on 64-bit AMD on NetBSD? Of course it always depends on the workload, but for the usual situation of a server serving many different clients, the clients will be spread out across the CPUs, with no client recieving more than 1 CPU's worth of work. I can imagine slightly pathological cases where a single client could benefit from having his query running across multiple CPUs, but I don't think it's at all a common case. > How well does it work today and how well would PostgreSQL work on a > multi-processor NetBSD system? Just fine on a multi-processor system. But don't bother unless you have lots of clients all banging away at once. > What more can be done to assure fast disk performance besides > implementing RAID on fast drives? You want to check out the documentation and mailing list archives on the PostgreSQL site. This has been discussed extensively. cjs -- -- Curt Sampson <cjs <at> cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. --George Bernard Shaw
RSS Feed