Re: pkgsrc gcc3 vs. sparc64?

In message <20030630230622.GA21553 <at> NetBSD.ORG>, you write: 

-> On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 06:30:47PM -0400, Rafal Boni wrote:
[..gcc3 woes...]
-> 
-> I don't know how to fix it properly so workarounds:
-> 	configure with --disable-shared so there will be no libgcc_s.so,
-> or
-> 	set TARGET_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS to usual -fPIC -DPIC in gcc/Makefile (after c
-> onfigure),
-> 	(there will be PIC penalty for libgcc_s.a).

Ah, so I assume I'm not the only one seeing this! That's a good start 
I'll try rebuilding with one of those suggestions.

-> I think ideally we should support multilib build and have both 32 and 64 
-> bit libraries, I looked there a little but put it off. And I also saw
-> another issue arisen from gcc33 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/
-> 2003/02/12/0023.html

Hmm, supporting both 32 and 64-bit libraries would indeed be nice, but 
it's nice to want (esp. since I don't have the time to beat on gcc 

Thanks for the workarounds and the pointer to the other problem (I knew
one of you or Martin would have tripped over this before! .

--rafal

----
Rafal Boni                                                     rafal <at> pobox.com
  We are all worms.  But I do believe I am a glowworm.  -- Winston Churchill