11 May 2006 16:00
Re: Binary packages for NetBSD/m68k 3.0 w/ pkgsrc-2006Q1
<thelarsons3 <at> cox.net>
2006-05-11 14:00:18 GMT
2006-05-11 14:00:18 GMT
Greg Oster <oster <at> cs.usask.ca> wrote: > Tim & Alethea Larson writes: > > What, no Mozilla? :) I've got to chuckle at the idea of using some of > > these on m68k...xscreensaver alone slows my box to a crawl. > > "I tried"... but it said something about not being available for m68k > boxes :-/ The contention on this (mac68k) list has been that the issue that once kept Mozilla/Firefox from running on m68k has been resolved by Mozilla no longer using the problematic modules. I traced back through the makefiles (where it mentions m68k dumping core in the comments) and commented out the restriction so I could try to build. Unfortunately I got a linking error (IIRC) late in the process. I've been trying to find someone else that could confirm this. This was discussed on port-mac68k in January, IIRC. If we can confirm this, the package maintainer could update the makefiles. Personally I'd be most interested in the firefox-gtk1 package, but if someone's successfully built the gtk2 packages, that would be fine too. > I certainly didn't see any SCSI issues on either of the Q700's or my > SE/30.. and they got into some very heavy paging in those 40 days.... > (65MB processes on a 20MB machine isn't much fun :-} ) Hmmm, mac68k has had a number of reports of SCSI errors during heavy load. This has kept me away from 3.0, since 2.1 seems very stable for me. I have a Q840AV with 112MB and two drives that I use to build. > > Is there anything special required to build generic m68k packages as > > opposed to mac68k/amiga/next68k/etc packages? > > Nope. That's great! So my personal archive (http://christtrek.dyndns.org:8000/NetBSD/packages) could be useful to more people. Tim -- -- Tim & Alethea
RSS Feed