20 Dec 2011 02:38
Re: interrupts on APs
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt <at> mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
2011-12-20 01:38:18 GMT
2011-12-20 01:38:18 GMT
hi, > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 03:44:59AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> hi, >> >> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:05:34AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> only think i'm aware of is the "no_irq_affinity" quirk for E7520/7320/7525. >> >> from their comment: >> >> >> >> /* BIOS may enable hardware IRQ balancing for >> >> * E7520/E7320/E7525(revision ID 0x9 and below) >> >> * based platforms. >> >> * Disable SW irqbalance/affinity on those platforms. >> >> */ >> >> >> >> can anyone test on those hardware? >> > >> > Tested on a Dell poweredge 2850 with 2 Xen 3,2Ghz (single-core, hyperthread) >> > with: >> > pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 >> > pchb0: Intel E7525 Memory Controller Hub (rev. 0x09) >> > ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Intel E7525 PCI Express Port A (rev. 0x09) >> > >> > Boot fails with obvious interrupts issues (messages from ehci controller >> > which looks like timeouts; 'lost interrupts' from cmdide). >> > With plain GENERIC from HEAD, there's no such issues. >> > >> > So this is one platform where it fails. >> >> does a dynamic reconfiguration (cpuctl nointr) fail similarly? > > I'm not sure what you ask for here. The kernel does't reach > single-user, so I've no chances to run cpuctl. > Or should I run cpuctlagainst the non-patched kernel ? If so, with what > arguments ? i meant eg. # cpuctl list (check #Intr column) # cpuctl nointr 0 # cpuctl list (check #Intr column again) but probably it isn't worth trying as it doesn't always work even on my box. :) YAMAMOTO Takashi > > -- > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer <at> antioche.eu.org> > NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference > --
RSS Feed