1 Oct 2003 22:47
Re: Using the delete key to "right-delete" chars
Greg A. Woods <woods <at> weird.com>
2003-10-01 20:47:57 GMT
2003-10-01 20:47:57 GMT
[ On Wednesday, October 1, 2003 at 21:28:50 (+0200), Christian Hattemer wrote: ] > Subject: Re: Using the delete key to "right-delete" chars > > Hm, what is a "real delete key"? One that when used for an ASCII terminal generates a DEL (0177).> I also have a separate delete key (all PS/2 > keyboards have it AFAIK) just above the arrow left key. So why do you need > it emulated? I don't really think of it as an emulation.
> Or is that a matter of personal preference? (Although I find it > simpler to press one key instead of two, but one could get used to it.) I have a vague memory that some aysnc terminal I was fond of also sent a DEL when <SHIFT-BackSpace> was pressed, though I may be confusing that with <SHIFT-BREAK> on the vt100. There are also the various AT&T keyboards I once used daily which have a separate Delete key up above or beside the BackSpace key just as with the Sun type-4 keyboard and so I'm accustomed to having some key in that region generate DEL but I want it to be less easily acessible than the BackSpace key since I use DEL as my interrupt key and BackSpace as my erase key. In any case it's mostly just personal preference. I hate to see a shifted key generate the same value as an un-shifted one when there's a logical alternative like this. When there's no physical Delete key just beyond the reach of the BackSpace key I'm now quite accustomed to trying <SHIFT-BackSpace>. -- -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods <at> robohack.ca> Planix, Inc. <woods <at> planix.com> Secrets of the Weird <woods <at> weird.com>

> I also have a separate delete key (all PS/2
> keyboards have it AFAIK) just above the arrow left key. So why do you need
> it emulated?
I don't really think of it as an emulation.
RSS Feed