14 Apr 2012 21:08
re: Current port status
matthew green <mrg <at> eterna.com.au>
2012-04-14 19:08:28 GMT
2012-04-14 19:08:28 GMT
> > i've had a new crash. i saw it with a 5.99.65 kernel and a > > very -current kernel, when trying to read a new kernel over NFS > > from the build machine: > > What do you mean by "read"? Are you just copying the kernel from NFS with > cp(1), or is the kernel booted from NFS? originall cp(1) but now i just use "what /nk" (/nk is a symlink to the right place), which crashes repeatably for me. > > > panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "cur->pcg_avail == cur->pcg_size" > > failed: file "/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_pool.c", line 2573 Stopped in pid > > 0.45 (system) at netbsd:cpu_Debugger+0x10: lwz r0, 0x14(r1) > > [...] > > not much idea about it yet. the assert means that because > > we've taken the slow path, the cache should be full. 100% > > repeatable for me. > > I couldn't reproduce that during the last days. Neither by running > standalone from NFS nor by copying a kernel or other large files from NFS. > > > Which network interface did you use? vr(4) or mvgbe(4)? vr(4). > With the recent 6_beta I realized that vr(4) has become nearly unusable and > frequently gets stuck with "vr0: device timeout". This has been observed > since 5.99.59, but not before 5.99.42. my 5.99.56 kernel seems pretty stable. i haven't noticed any new vr(4) issues there. my 6.99.4 kernel seems stable when using NFS for /usr/src and running a build, it's only these kernels (large files?) > I have neither the time to look into all that nor am I experienced enough to > fix all the open issues, so I fear that there will be no ofppc release for > 6.0. oh, i'll release![]()
RSS Feed