4 Jan 2010 00:44
Re: Drupal Template
Niels Reedijk wrote: > Hi Matt, > > 2010/1/3 Matt Madia <mattmadia@...>: > >>> That's fine, but understand that under the GPL when you pass it to >>> other people they have the right to modify, and distribute the source >>> code. So this includes the right to publish it. So any agreement to >>> keep it 'under wraps' is a gentlemen's agreement, not one enforceable >>> through a license or copyright. Just for your information. >>> >>> >> Not only that, once the theme is distributed to anyone outside of the >> organization, then it must be freely available to anyone. To me, >> 'organization' in this sense infers 'websites under Haiku Inc. -- >> *.haiku-os.org, *.haiku-files.org'. 3rd party websites, Haikuware, >> OSDrawer, Haiku-os.it, and so-on would be outside of the organization, >> since they are not affiliated with Haiku Inc. >> > > That's a misunderstanding of the GPL that we have come across on this > list before. > > Shortly put: when you distribute a binary (or the source) to someone, > that person has the right to modify and distribute it. If Jorge passes > on the source to me, I can modify and/or distribute that. > > The error is in thinking that if Jorge sends it to me, he must make it > available for everyone. That is not true. Only the people that get it > have the right to access the source and distribute it. > > Of course, anyone with access to the source can distribute it. So > that's why you can only rely on a gentlemen's agreement if you want to > share some GPL code but want to keep it under wraps. > My understanding is exactly the same as that of Niels. IOW, I don't see the need to make a public release (which, IMO, has no direct benefit for Haiku). Now, HUG sites using the same Drupal theme with a standard linking/navigation scheme pointing to strategic places (i.e., the Haiku website, Trac, SVN, Donations, Store, etc.) would be beneficial, as they would reinforce the Haiku brand and also have a social networking effect that would be beneficial from a community building POV. That's why I am inclined to pass on the theme to HUGs (such as haiku-os.it). I understand that the HUG would then have the right to re-distribute the theme (as it is GPL), but I don't see that as a major risk. That being said, if the consensus is that the theme should not be distributed to HUGs, I can live with that too. >> So, I would be in favor of not distributing the current Shijin 3 theme >> at all and instead, providing the generic theme (which would be seen >> as a second body of work) that Jorge initially proposed. >> > > Naturally the images that contain the Haiku logo are not under MIT or > GPL license, and as such cannot be distributed. Everything else in > terms of the license complies, so that can be re-used. > > So Jorge: there is no problem with distributing Shijin sans Haiku > logo. But I would suggest asking those that get the theme to at least > make their work stand out from our website in order to protect the > Haiku brand. > I will try to work with the haiku-os.it guys and, if they agree, will see if we can show the work for peer review prior to going live. HTH, -- -- Jorge/aka Koki Website: http://haikuzone.net RSS: http://haikuzone.net/rss.xml
RSS Feed