headers
Stuart Henderson | 23 Nov 21:50
Favicon

Re: -current, softraid on root?

On 2008-11-23, bofh <goodb0fh <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> What is this "life" thing?  Is it part of base.tgz?  It sounds as if
> some of us may not have it, so maybe it is in ports?

of course; it's in /usr/ports/games.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
ropers | 23 Nov 18:58

Re: httpdump?

>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:18:00PM -0800, Jeff Simmons wrote:

>> Just increase the snaplen.
>>
>> tcpdump -s 65000 -w dump port 80

With some tcpdump(8) versions on non-OpenBSD Unix-like OSes (e.g.
tcpdump version 3.9.8/Ubuntu 8.10), the man page says:

 -s     Snarf snaplen bytes of data from each packet (...) Set‐
              ting snaplen to 0 means use the required length to catch
whole packets.

The man page for OpenBSD's tcpdump doesn't mention anything about
setting the snaplen to 0, and trying to invoke OpenBSD's tcpdump with
-s 0 results in an error of:

> tcpdump: invalid snaplen 0

(tested with OpenBSD 4.3 GENERIC)

This is probably a naive question, but how would one best replicate
the -s 0 functionality with OpenBSD's tcpdump? Is there a reason why
Jeff specifically suggested -s 65000?

Many thanks and regards,
--ropers
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Василий Озеров | 23 Nov 12:45

Re: Problems with installation OpenBSD 4.4

There are all sets:

bsd, bsd.rd, base, game, and others...
And they all are readable.

--

-- 
WBR, Ozerov Vasiliy aka fr33man.
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Василий Озеров | 23 Nov 12:18

Problems with installation OpenBSD 4.4

Good day.

I have a little problem with installing OpenBSD 4.4 on my computer.
I have successfully booted from cdrom drive and created drive partitions.
I get problem when I want to install sets. I am choose to install
bsd, bsd.rd, base44.tgz, etc44.tgz, misc44.tgz, comp44.tgz,
man44.tgz, game44.tgz. After openbsd installer has got all this sets
it does nothing.

It looks like this:

Getting bsd...
100% |********| 6700 KB 00:04
...
...
Getting game44.tgz ...
100% |********| 2552 KB 00:00

And after that openbsd doesn't do anything... It stops..
The only way is to reboot system...

I think it is problems with sata drive..

Can you help me?

--

-- 
WBR, Ozerov Vasiliy aka fr33man.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Anathae Townsend | 23 Nov 01:55
Favicon

pcidevs diff, Radeon HD 3650 AGP, Mobility HD 3650, SIS 5518 EIDE Controller

Is this better?

Index: pcidevs
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1435
diff -c -r1.1435 pcidevs
*** pcidevs     18 Nov 2008 23:26:38 -0000      1.1435
--- pcidevs     23 Nov 2008 00:54:28 -0000
***************
*** 1092,1097 ****
--- 1092,1099 ----
  product ATI RADEON_HD3870     0x9501  Radeon HD 3870
  product ATI RADEON_HD2600_M76 0x9581  Mobility Radeon HD 2600
  product ATI RADEON_HD2600_PRO 0x9589  Radeon HD 2600 Pro
+ product ATI RADEON_HD3650_M   0x9591  Mobility Radeon HD 3650
+ product ATI RADEON_HD3650_AGP 0x9596  Radeon HD 3650 AGP
  product ATI RADEON_HD3650     0x9598  Radeon HD 3650
  product ATI RADEON_HD3450     0x95c5  Radeon HD 3450
  product ATI RS780_HB          0x9600  RS780 Host
***************
*** 4203,4208 ****
--- 4205,4211 ----
  product SIS 5511              0x5511  5511
  product SIS 5512              0x5512  5512
  product SIS 5513              0x5513  5513 EIDE
+ product SIS 5518              0x5518  5518 UDMA EIDE
  product SIS 5571              0x5571  5571 PCI
  product SIS 5581              0x5581  5581
  product SIS 5582              0x5582  5582
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
soko.tica | 23 Nov 01:34

inet aliases and assigning various services (NTPD)

Hello list

I want to assign NTPD service to a specific inet alias, and to
separate it from other services running. While I know how to run DNS
services under specific inet alias, I can't figure how to configure
NTPD to run on inet alias, and not on "major" IP address.

I did make a search of archives, but wasn't able to find anything.

Many thanks in advance for any help about the issue.
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Chris Kuethe | 23 Nov 00:24

Re: diff to make lynx use anonymous ftp password

DO NOT WANT!

you can already suppress the userid by setting the USER environment
variable, and the server operator gets your ip and/or hostname in the
logs already... if you must do something like this, make lynx honor
the HOST variable.

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Dieter Rauschenberger <dr <at> d-ra.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the following diff
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=lynx_nospam.diff;att=1;bug=137480
>
> It makes lynx to use anonymous@ instead of user <at> host as password for
> anonymous ftp connections.
>
> Testet on i386 with OpenBSD 4.4 (sorry, no -current around).
>
> Regards
>  Dieter
> Index: HTFTP.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/lynx/WWW/Library/Implementation/HTFTP.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -p -r1.7 HTFTP.c
> --- HTFTP.c     22 Jun 2004 04:01:42 -0000      1.7
> +++ HTFTP.c     22 Nov 2008 22:55:00 -0000
> @@ -863,44 +863,16 @@ PRIVATE int get_connection ARGS2(
>            HTSprintf0(&command, "PASS %s%c%c", password, CR, LF);
>        } else {
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
don cipo | 22 Nov 19:31

Intel ICH9R/DO/DH SATA

Does OBSD support Intel ICH9R/DO/DH SATA controller ?
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Marc Balmer | 22 Nov 17:46
Favicon

Re: Latest Portable OpenNTPD?

* Anirban Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:36:36PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > * Anirban Sinha <ASinha <at> zeugmasystems.com> [2008-11-21 04:33]:
> > > > On 2008-11-21, Don Hiatt <DHiatt <at> zeugmasystems.com> wrote:
> > > > > I was looking at http://openntpd.org/ for the latest Portable
> > > > > OpenBSD an saw that it is at 3.9p1 while the non-portable is
> > > > > at 4.3. A colleague of mine is tired of fighting with ntpd.org's
> > > > > ntpd server so I suggested OpenNTPD. Is there a newer version
> > > > > of the Portable OpenNTPD or is 3.9p1 the latest?
> > > >
> > > > >That's the latest portable version, but the OpenBSD one has
> > > > >since been improved.
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering if any work is currently underway to port the
> latest
> > > > OpenNTPD to other platforms? Looks like there has been lot of good
> work
> > > > in OpenNTPD since version 3.9. It would be really nice to have it
> for
> > > > other platforms as well.
> > >
> > > not as far as I am aware. which is a pity.
> 
> > Robert Nagy did a bunch of work pulling in much of the recent changes.
> > I put up a snapshot[1] a while back with these, but there's been no
> > release.
> 
> > There's more work to be done, and some of it is going to be nontrivial
> > to port (eg sensors, adjtime(NULL, olddelta) returning the remaining
> > offset) and I have been busy with other things and slacking in this
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jason Dixon | 22 Nov 17:26
Favicon

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space avaible

On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 08:36:44AM +0200, Yuriy A. Dmitrishin wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I get such message every morning when I come to my work.
> 
> I try to increase limits in pf.conf: set limit { states 50000, frags 50000, 
> src-nodes 50000 } but it doesn't solve this problem.
> 
> My ip: 193.239.143.252.
> 
> Routing table: 
> default            193.239.143.193    UGS         3    14062      -   tun0

Are you using OpenVPN?

--

-- 
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Javier Vasquez | 22 Nov 13:50

Wondering about openbsd way to update for patches.

Hi,

I'm just looking at how openbsd works to see if it suits my needs.  I
have a small old box (piii celeron @797 MHz & 32KB $, with 512 MB
ram), and in my experience compiling just the linux kernel takes ~4
hrs, and compiling gcc/g++ takes ~24 hrs...

I read in the documentation that if there are fixes, they come through
patches, and then to keep things simple, the easiest "fastest" way is
to keep the whole stable source tree up to date with patches, which
imply initial compilation + recompiling any time a patch arise...

I'm wondering whether this would mean lots of compilation time, which
in this small machine might take too much...

So it's true there's no binary way to keep the system patched, right?

Thanks,

--

-- 
Javier
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |

Gmane