Re: QTCTL?

> This is similar to the "changes" file proposed above, but it´s simple, does not
> require two new RPCs (a server would respond to a Tinval with an Rerror
> (unknown request or whatever), is not an upcall (although behaves as one) and
> may both let the client know which files changed and which cache
> entries are invalid.

the advantage of the changes file is that it requires no new rpcs at all
so you can do it today