Re: New kernel patch 127127-11

For that matter, you can still run NFS client in single user if
you do not have enough local storage and need to place the patch
repository on a central server.

I will say this though, I have had far more problems with patches
failing and system instability when I've patched in multi-user
than I have when I have followed the recommendations any patched
in single-user.

fpsm
-- 
Fredrich Maney
A*R*C

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pca-bounces <at> lists.univie.ac.at 
> [mailto:pca-bounces <at> lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Christophe Kalt
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:37 AM
> To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
> Subject: Re: [pca] New kernel patch 127127-11
> 
> On Apr 30, Mike Moya wrote:
> | Therefore forcing the patch get installed in single user 
> mode. It just  
> | isn't reasonable to have to install
> | ~150 file servers by hand in single user mode (rather than 
> scripted at  
> | 1AM when nothing is going on). Is there a way to turn off 
> this "safe  
> | mode"?
> 
> Single-user installations can also be scripted, that's what
> i've done after i came across some patch that wouldn't install
> because of some (NFS or lofs) mounts.
> 
>