16 Aug 2011 03:07
Re: Fraction of reverts
Diederik van Liere <dvanliere <at> gmail.com>
2011-08-16 01:07:46 GMT
2011-08-16 01:07:46 GMT
Some more pointers: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newbie_reverts_and_article_length http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newbie_reverts_and_subsequent_editing_behavior Best, Diederik On 2011-08-15, at 9:00 PM, Denny Vrandecic wrote: > Thank you, Daniel! > > On Aug 15, 2011, at 17:12, Daniel Mietchen wrote: > >> Hi Denny, >> >> just read >> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-08-15/Women_and_Wikipedia&oldid=445064196 >> earlier today, which >> states >> "Women are more likely to be reverted when they have very few edits >> (7% vs 5%); however, in accounts with more than eight edits, the >> effect disappears." >> >> Cheers, >> >> Daniel >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Denny Vrandecic >> <vrandecic <at> googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> does anyone have a rough estimate of how many edits get reverted? >>> Does anyone have a study handy? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Denny >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wiki-research-l mailing list >>> Wiki-research-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki-research-l mailing list >> Wiki-research-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
RSS Feed