Platonides | 2 Aug 2007 23:30
Picon

Re: Job queue length

Simetrical wrote:
> I did say "change *that much*".  Sufficiently ambiguous for me to
> weasel my way out of any evidence you can come up with.  ;)  But
> seriously, the only thing that matters is whether the job queue is
> persistently high, and if it is, that will be . . . well, persistent.
> If it spikes for two minutes and then drops back (how quickly do those
> job queue runners work anyway?) then who cares if that's not reflected
> in the stat?  Average all the ten-minute samplings over the last day
> if you like.

Unless you specified that 96 seconds ago the job queue was X, 10 minute 
sampling will confuse even more. After changing a tempalte used on 
hundreds of pages, i'll go to see how much work i added to the job 
queue, if the data is older than 30-60 seconds i may need to go there, 
i'll have the dangerous think "it wasn't so much load".

Gmane