Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: Michael Barr <barr <at> math.mcgill.ca>
Subject: Re: Who said: General Abstract Nonsense
Newsgroups: gmane.science.mathematics.categories
Date: Tuesday 19th May 1998 22:43:26 UTC (over 18 years ago)
This is interesting if indeed it was due to Steenrod.  In that case, it
was certainly not intended as a putdown (as Lang clearly intended it).
Sammy Eilenberg told on a number of occasions the story that when General
Theory of Natural Equivalences was published, Steenrod said that no paper
had ever influenced his thinking more.  He had been searching for years
for an axiomatization of homology theory, but had never thought of using
the induced homomorphisms as the basic tool.  The result was, of course,
the Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms.  (The rest of the story is that P.A. Smith
said he never read a more trivial paper in his life.  Sammy commented that
both reactions were valid.)

On Tue, 19 May 1998, Tim Heap wrote:

> pareigis  writes:
> 
> Bodo> Hi - who coined the expression
> Bodo>    General Abstract Nonsense
> Bodo> as a synonym for category theory?  Where did it first appear in
> Bodo> print?
> 
> Lang, in his book `Algebra' says:
> 	"The terminology is due to Steenrod."
> 
> 	tim
>
 
CD: 3ms